National Assessment And Accreditation Council (NAAC)
Extended Profile
Criteria 1 – Curricular Aspects (100)
Key Indicator- 1.1. Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)
Key Indicator- 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30) Key Indicator- 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30) Key Indicator- 1.4 Feedback System (20)Criteria 2 – Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)
Key Indicator- 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.1.1. QnM | Enrollment Percentage | 20 |
2.1.2 QnM |
Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years(Exclusive of supernumerary seats) | 20 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.2.1. QnM | Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | 40 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.3.1. QlM | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences using ICT tools. | 40 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.4.1. QnM | Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | 15 |
2.4.2. QnM | Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) | 25 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.5.1. QlM | Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient. | 40 |
Key Indicator-2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.6.1. QlM | Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website. | 45 |
2.6.2. QlM | Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. | |
2.6.3. QnM | Pass Percentage of students during last five years. | 45 |
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
2.7.1. QnM | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. | 60 |
Criteria 3 – Research, Innovations and Extension (110)
Key Indicator 3.1- Resource Mobilization for Research (10)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
3.1.1. QnM | Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | 10 |
Key Indicator 3.2 innovation Ecosystem (15)
Key Indicator 3.3. Research Publication and Awards (25)Key Indicator 3.4- Extension Activities (40)
Key Indicator 3.5 – Collaboration (20)
Criteria 4 – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)
Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)
Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource (20)
Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
4.3.1. QlM | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection. | 20 |
4.3.2. QnM |
Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | 10 |
Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
4.4.1. QnM |
Percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities) excluding salary component during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | 20 |
Criteria 5 – Student Support and Progression (140)
Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (50)
Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (30)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
5.2.1 QnM | Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years. | 20 |
5.2.2 QnM | 10 |
Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (50)
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
5.3.1 QnM | Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years. | 25 |
5.3.2 QnM | 25 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
5.4.1 QlM | There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services. | 10 |
Criteria 6 – Governance, Leadership and Management (100)
Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10)
Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10)
Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (35)
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (15)
Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
Criteria 7 – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator- 7.1. Institutional Values and best Practices (50)
Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30)Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
7.2.1 QlM | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual | 30 |
Metric No. | Description | Weightage |
7.3.1 QlM | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | 20 |